So it's not possible to say, whether one is automatically better than another. Also there is thing commonly called pre-echo, which can be disturbing in some cases. More filter precision towards low end you'd need, the more latency will be necessary. phase EQs, which can process input samples directly one by one). However there are certain other tradeoffs with that, as there is always required some processing latency (essentially filters there needs to work over chunks of audio samples as opposed to min. Linear phase EQs change just magnitude and keeps phase intact. Majority of them belongs to the first group (including all analog EQs), filters there change both magnitude and phase - always, the steeper filter, the more phase shift you'd get. ))))WOW!!! What are you trying to say?īasically you can find two basic kinds of EQs - minimum and linear phase. It's VERY unmusical - only surgery or "I don't give a f**k" tracks. Fabfilter one sucks series#U create a duplicate track, put Fab EQ on it, process, turn on parent channel - WOW!!! PHASE!!!! even waves q series beat it. Let's say, U're trying to process a kick drum or whatever in parallel, using High Pass filter of q2/q3. In the end I realised Pro-Q sounded just as good and I didn't need to worry about tweaking any under the hood stuff, and I preferred Pro-Q's interface reliability and cpu usage so it made it the obvious choice. It is no slouch in IIR mode either.I spent ages playing around with Equilibriums impulse settings when I was demoing it back in the day vs Pro-Q. And it has a handy impulse (& phase) graph to help with the adjustment choices. This is where Equilibrium shines it offers a number of ways to tighten the impulse response while using high impulse lengths, providing the best of both worlds. Raise the impulse response length and the time domain is less accurate, pre-ringing goes up (in Linear Phase) or the image is more smeared in minimum phase. Lower the impulse response and the EQ loses frequency accuracy (bad for tight low cuts or other surgical low end work). * One of the typical tradeoffs with FIR EQs (especially Linear Phase EQs) is frequency precision vs. Options have been added and/or updated for no charge. It can be used as a simple utility EQ for every channel or as a hardcore high resolution mastering EQ. Fabfilter one sucks pro#It sounds just as good (if not better) - in fact it has much better low frequency response with less pre-ringing in the FIR modes * you can adjust the interface to taste (to extreme in fact) it can be run with all the same processing modes as Pro Q, and then some - and more.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |